The eye relief is the only thing that I'm a little concerned about with the Bushnell vs a Leupold. Hopefully the eye relief of the 3200 will be fine.


Added:
I like the look and feel of the Sightron SII 3-9x42. I looked through one a few days ago and it was very clear and bright, but I'm just a little concerned about the company itself. You know, will they be around 10 or 15 years from now should something go wrong with the scope? Although, everything I have read about the Sightron SII and the company has been positive. I emailed them a few days ago and asked them what their warranty policy was on their scopes if I was not the original owner/purchaser of the scope. The reply they sent me stated their warranty covers the product regardless of who the purchaser or original owner was.

If I were to buy a Nikon, I would go ahead and get the Monarch. The Optic Zone has them in gloss for 239 bucks. The eye relief on them is a little better than the Bushnell at about 3.5" and I believe it is a constant 3.5".

Actually, I will probably give the Nikon Monarch some serious thought before I get the Bushnell. I hate having to make decisions like this..LOL!