If you ask for smaller WMU's, then hunters won't be as free to roam larger areas to harvest doe. It will mean that X number of tags will be less efficient. Since the PGC still wants and needs more herd reductions done to "balance the herd with its habitat" are you then going to ask for more doe tags to be issued to balance the loss of efficiency that large WMU's presented. Or are you saying that you want smaller WMU's with < or = the number of doe tags for 2004 so that there are not as many doe taken, and thus opposing the PGC deer managers on thier efforts to further reduce for the sake of the habitat?
This is the very problem that led to the too big WMU's. Heck when they first came out I heard guys bitchin up a storm cause their county got split in half. I live on the 2B 2D line in Westmoreland and local could now hunt on their land but not their neighbors. It's likely we all will have to accept some bitter pills no matter how they do the DMU's. Frankly, one of the big complaints has been from guys who dont want to cahnge where they hunt. Smaller DMU's will undoubtedly make that a bigger issue.
To answer your question, the efficency of the doe tags will probably change so the TOTAL actual number up or down cant be answered without a lot more information