Okay, I've attempted to stay fairly benign on these many threads comparing the .243 to the heavyweight calibers. I've also stated that I've dropped at least four bucks with a 6mm (including two Muley bruisers). I'm very fond of the 6mm for deer (and Antelope) but I no longer use it. But really guys, I challenge you to show up on a guided hunt for Elk, Moose, Bear, or Safari (Cape Buffalo for example) with a 6mm or .243...you'll be given a quick return ticket home.

The fact of the matter is the .243 will not compare to the larger calibers for sheer killing prowess, penetration, devastation and sensibility. It never could compare nor will it ever compare. If that were the case, the caliber would enjoy popularity for the really big game (which is doesn't). Is it big enough for deer..yep. Can the .243 drop deer dead...absolutely! Is it a fine caliber for deer...certainly.

Will a head-shot squirrel die just as instantaneousy from a .22 as a .270...yuppers.

Is the .243 so awesome a caliber that it can hope to hang with the heavyweights where supersized game animals are concerned...nope! Why not? Cause it ain't got enough ass! Stop trying to make such a ludicrous argument on the caliber's behalf by comparing it to the big stuff.

Next thing ya' know you'll have someone convinced they can pack their .243 to Africa for a Safari...I nominate you to guide them too!

Dangit, I meant to place this post in the other thread, I've lost track there's so many...sigh...