HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)
View Single Post
Old 12-08-2004 | 04:25 PM
  #10  
zrexpilot's Avatar
zrexpilot
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default RE: Velocity verses Energy. (the debate)

ORIGINAL: johnch

You left out the third side of the debate , bore diamiter or bullet frontal area.
IMO a fast small cal will not kill any better than my slow large cal.
I hunt with a 45/70 rifle and a 44 mag revolver and both kill better than the velocity or energy says they should.
No, I spoke of this on the opening thread (wound channell) which defantley is part of this debate. Thats why I say energy is not what kills.
Like I said above a colt 45 has only 375lb energy at 25 yds.
zrexpilot is offline  
Reply