I won't revisit this issue with you two, as we have fundamental differences with respect to our views of the right to hunt. While I do believe that a person does have property rights, I also feel that the right to hunt is a fundamental, prehistoric one, which predates any vested property rights. I feel that good, taxpaying citizens, as owners of the deer, have some right to hunt them.
Aren't those two statements at odds with other since the individual landowner is the only one that pays taxes on his or her land? I will also say that while your opinions may be fundamentally different, if you practice what you preach then you are a tresspasser and a poacher regardless of your fundamental belief.