Shooting 83% BB in your harvest and then blaming my kind for your lack of 1.5 buck opportunities is pure hipocrasy. Plain and simple, if you want to shoot BB, that is fine with me, I'll work around you, but don't blame anyone but the man in the mirror when no 1.5 buck are seen next year.
Where in heavens name did you get the impression I was blaming anyone for the lack of 1.5 bucks in my area. I told you repeatedly that I no longer care about bucks because I don't want to put forth the effort to harvest a buck under the current regs. Furthermore, it would be ridiculous to blame a rack hunter for the lack of 1.5 buck,since they don't shoot BB and many apparently don't shoot doe.
Why is it that if I don't see what I'm after, I can somehow live with a tag unfilled, but if your kind sees no 1.5 bucks, they reduce to burger all next years crop and then stand innocent of all responsibility?
The difference is we believe in herd reduction while you don't . We didn't shoot those BB because we didn't see any 1.5 buck, we shot them because we didn't see more adult doe. Filling a buck tag doesn't decrease the number of anterles deer one can harvest ,so your reasoning is flawed.
What you simply can't accept is that Alt's herd reduction plan will mean a lot fewer buck,whether we try to protect BB or not. If we kill 2 adult doe in order to save 1 BB , there will be two fewer BB born the following year ,so saving BB does not increase the number of future buck as you might expect.