No , it is you who complains, I am a happy hunter, remember?
Apparently you don't know the difference between complaining about the low buck harvests or having a discussion about the effects of Alt's plan and AR. When I say AR reduced the buck harvest by 61K, I am simply stating a fact and I am not complaining. Alt could make all antlered bucks illegal and it wouldn't have a significant impact on me since I only have a few good years left to hunt. But, I would still discuss the issue and point out the negative impact of such a decision.
Seems like something you gotta deal with and not Gary Alts fault. I still don't get you guys, do you think HR is necessary? I still can't tell either way what you want. By the way, harvesting buttons IS a selfish act IF you are going to complain later about no opportunities to harvest a buck.
You don't know our position because you won't listen!! I specifically stated we shot those BB in order to reduce the herd in our area. Remember the deer are eating my strawberries ,corn and carrots , their eating the farmers crops and we have quite a few road kills. You ,on the otherhand place saving BB ahead of HR ,because you are selfish and want more bucks to hunt. Protecting BB means not shooting fawns which means more deer ,more over browsing ,crop damage and roadkills. It also means Alt's plan will fail. Is that what you want?