Scoring seems to me a bit strange.

Compare Lefty26's 7 point that scores half of ToddGraf's Monster. Yet Todd's rack is easily 4 times larger. (just as comparison only - nothing insinuated here at all)

I'd like to see a scoring system that is more representative of the true size. For example, scoring by volume / points / then spread - as in how much volume would the antlers displace in a tub of water, then how many points, then spread.

So Todd's deer would score something like: 5000/8/17
(5000ml water displaced / 8 points / 17" spread) paints a better picture to me than 143 6/8

Lefty's would score: 980/7/4