RE: "Reports" and legal issues??
pdq......
BowTech has NOTHING to do with this discussion,really. My statement to you isn't a slap honest!....<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle> I'm just clearing the air as several people seem to think Frank's report was a BowTech slam, I think that got lost in there somewhere along the line.
This is simply a discussion on "reports" in general.
The only thing NOT glowing in Franks report of his new bow was that of "Feel"....not quality or performance. He said himself that 95% of the report was positive, and the rest was feel related, and not quality issues.
That could be your bow, my bow, or ANYBODY'S bow.
The point at hand is whether or not we are treading on thin ice if we post a "Report" that some manufacturer feels is "Damaging" in some way. Are we responsible in some way if they feel we are "Hurting" their sales in any way.
I'm with the Freedom of Speech crowd on this one.....if it's not a direct slanderous statement meant to purposely damage a manufacturer's credibility, then we should be fine......that said........
Disclaimer:
This post is the opinion of "Matt / PA" and in no way reflects the views and opinions of Huntingnet and it's sponsors. All rights reserved and unauthorized transcripts are strictly forbidden without the expressed written consent of "Matt / PA" and Major League Baseball. ...........<img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>