ORIGINAL: c903

pin:

I suppose if a person that has a question has highly technical knowledge and is a certified "technician" or a mechanical engineer, or a physicist in another applicable field, he or she would most likely ask a question in a fashion that "Bubba and his Bow Buddies" or the average but skilled archer probably would not understand and therefore would not attempt to answer or provide a solution.

If the subject, a question, a presented opinion, etc, is general and not highly technical, and the phraseology does not indicate the person is highly technical and would understand such information as "Static and Dynamic testing from those such as Norb and Emery," I would assume the person is inviting everyone to contribute their opinion or advice, or what someone may believe the problem and the solution is. If you or anyone else that considers themselves to have greater technical knowledge than "Bubba and his Bow Buddies" and know the answer given is incorrect, then you and/or they can jump in and contribute what you/they know or believe is the correct answer.

You say with obvious confidence that the belief that solo cams are faster than twin cams if of the same configuration, and the belief by some that drop-away rests are more accurate than any other rest are untrue. Is your technical notice that both beliefs are untrue an accepted and indisputable fact that all in the industry and all archers concur with, or are both beliefs still open to debate by different manufacturers, archers, engineers, etc? I do not know.

However, if your notice is an indisputable fact, then the verdict is in. If a person wants the most speed possible out of a bow, he or she should not purchase a solo cam bow. If the person wants a rest that enables the best accuracy, he or she should not purchase a drop-away rest. Jeez! Do you realize how many "Bubba" shooters there are in the sport?