HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Kimber 1911 handguns
View Single Post
Old 08-16-2004 | 06:09 AM
  #8  
USMC PMI's Avatar
USMC PMI
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Kimber 1911 handguns

Thanks for the postings. I have two Kimber's myself, a Stainless and a blued GoldMatch. I have fired both in Marine Corps matches, they have performed as well as custom built $3000 dollar guns, I feel they are worth every penny. I am with Big Country on the price, if you bought a Springfield and paid to have the same options put on it as the Kimber, then paid to match the accuracy and smooth as slik feel (if possible) you would spend twice as much. I have never fired a Wilson handgun but they do hold a great reputation. I posted this becsue there was a member giving me a hard time about the Kimber's and I felt his claims were un-substianciated, so I posted this question hoping to hear and confirm what I know, they are excellent. I purchased both of mine before the MD dictatorship attempted to ban all quality handgun sales, the first in 1998 and the second in 2000. I wanted to buy the Tatical Pro II and found out that I could not because the Communist Dictatorship of Maryland practically banned new handgun sales by requiring an obscure type of integrated trigger locking device that many companies will not comply with. Showing how idiotic their new law was, the first to produce guns with the lock were the cheap garbage blow-up boxes they were trying to prevent in the first place. I'm just going to have to move out of this Godless shell of a state, getting too crowded anyway, sure it won't be long before they build houses near my range and that gets shutdown so yuppies are not disturbed while reading their evening paper. Thanks again for the responses.
USMC PMI is offline  
Reply