God! This is getting old. How can the same statements be pounded out over and over as fact when they're not. AZ is the basis and just punch up the AZ game and fish site and analyze the annual report or read old posts. We do not get the majority of funding from sucking the federal teat. Military service is much appreciated but what's that got to do with the facts of the USO case? The suit was based on the interstate commerce clause and NOT on discrimination toward non-res hunters. Another one is that all of the country owns bambi. Read again, courts ruled long ago that the feds own the land and the states own the animals. Stating the opposite over and over doesn't make you right. We have a 10% non-res cap. It may be moved up along with cost. The USO suit can be whipped by a 2/3 vote of our legislature outlawing the transport of game animal parts by a business. I hope this works out with more non-res tags and a good screwing of USO. That said, I hope those tags are not out of reach of the average hunter. No way will hunters here roll over for the liberal 9th district and you can call it anarchy if ya want.