For those politicians that are attempting to whitewash the occurrence, diminish the significance of the act and the actions of Len and davidmil by demeaning those opposed, and trying to justify the incident by using examples that are in complete contrast; doing so might make you feel better if you are trying to surreptitiously justify having the same character, and some others might buy into the same defense for the same reasons or because of a ridiculous forum loyalty to elected gurus.

However, I have never been so confident of a probability when I say; you put the entire incident before a large group of real hunters, regardless of weapon used, I am positive that to the man and to the women, all would consider the entire incident, from the act to the display of the photos, totally an half-witted act, a blatant infringement upon the reputation of all good hunters, and an act that could only be committed and then worldly-revealed by someone so arrogant and so stuck on his/herself as to believe they could do so without repercussions.

My opposition has nothing to do with being an "ethics cop." However, if some believe that the term fits me, and that is the best they can do to justify their own indiscretions, so be it. I would rather that I am seen in the position that I choose, then to be seen in the position that some others have chosen.

Some people are well covered by the fact that ignorance is blissful.