HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Safety first (pics)
View Single Post
Old 07-07-2004 | 09:06 PM
  #24  
doubleA
Typical Buck
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Safety first (pics)

Just how the hell do you think you know what Im shooting into. Are you just ASS uming I dont?
In your original post I understood it to mean that the trees were 350 yards behind the target, sorry for mistaking that!

Poopy, now in your other rants you said
Actually I do know what is behind my target, and this tree is less then 10 feet from my targets.
Since when are trees considered safe backstops? If you do have a berm, which I seriously doubt, it should be placed as close to the target frames as possible. There should not be anything between the berm and target frame. When you have hard objects such as a tree in your case, richochets are possible.

If you dont mind, why dont you take a picture with a wider view so we can see the target area and the type of backstop you are using, then we would not have to assume anything. You know the saying..a picture is worth a thousand words.

PS and speaking of pictures, try to scale your pictures down to 600-700 pixels wide instead of the 1200. It's a lot faster to downloadand user friendly.

Enquiring minds want to know, doubleA
doubleA is offline  
Reply