Your problem is ,the only way you can defend your position is to misrepresent my position. I have always been in favor of reducing the herd to the true carrying capacity of the habitat and in developed areas it may be necessary to reduce it even more. The problem is Alt's plan is based on the outdated OWDD goals that only account for forested habitat. That is why the WMU's with the worst habitat have the highest OWDD goals and the counties with the best habitat have the lowest goals. Personally I don't understand how any rational person can support Alt's plan when the entire plan is based on the flawed premise that deer only use forested habitat.