MarkIIVT

I sent several emails myself and discussed this on 2-3 different boards to gain support, and inform people of what is happening when these 3 were appointed. If your so good at putting your money where your mouth is then get to some other forum where we don't have to listen your ignorant trash. You just love trying to separate the hunters even when you know nothing about what was being said above.

And again for your political "blowback" theory, sure it would have gotten you an A in class, but too bad it's just a hypothetical situation that you and your computer think is what happened. I gave you several reason not only why your proposed plan wouldn't work and why your political "blowback" theory is invalid, and yet all the info you can give me is why you beleive it is true. It just doesn't add up Mark. I can gaurentee that if you took a poll of all Kansas deer-hunters, on whether they supported or were against the unitization of bow permits, there would be over-welming support against any of it. You need to come out of your shell buddy. I doubt you hunt much or actually talk much to the public to real hunters. It's obvious you have a biased opinion against bowhunters and anyone that read this post could clearly see that. Maybe it was the buck you shot with the arrow in the neck... who knows.

You do have a lot of good ideas on certain things, and it seems you are here to help just like the rest of us, and you claim to be on the "hunters" side, just going about it in the wrong biased way. I do not claim to know everything and doubt I have done near as much data research on this subject as you. But data information is only as important as amount you know about the people it affects, which is the biggest part of your theory and your knowledge that is missing.

Enough said on this subject for me, you don't and most likely will never get it, enough time wasted here.