RE: not for the wolf lovers
I think we have pretty well hashed over items 1) evolution and 2) survival (of the fittest) to the point of saturation BUT....
The OTHER two items brought up by ElkTalk83810 could use investigating:
3)Why? (Does any one of you even have the faintest clue as to WHY the wolf was reintroduced?) and
4)Who? (Does any one of you have any idea WHO was the greatest proponent of this great "save the wolf" campaign?)
Would make for some interesting reading if the facts are available. If they are, then things may become a little more black and white. It could end up as a "Paul Harvey" scenario.... "Now you know the REST of the story!"
I'm not sure it will lend itself to the much loved scientific method, but could still be very interesting and informative. Is this information available?
EKM