RA but they are easier to maintain an acceptable level of proficiency with over any given time period without as much practice as a traditional shooter needs to engage in.
This is the crux of my position / arguement.
(I looked that up - the word crux
)
acceptable level of proficiency
For hunting ....Yes...I agree.
But for Archery???
I look at everything in its upper-end. How much would it take to be "Real good". To be real good at anything (able to compete with the best) is always a great challenge. To do that with a compound you need "perfection". Do you see the scores these clowns win with[:-][
].
I coumpond is easier to shoot well...........but not easier to shoot great!