I am saying that a trads realistic upper end goals are NO more challanging than a compounders with all the good stuff.
Upper end goals ?Are you talking about me and you and which bows are more challenging or Larry Yien, Howard Hill, Olympians etc etc ? Huge differnce man, some guys are gifted, most of us aint
Also, look at the time invested in master the given weapon. Again, with exceptions the average guy really has to put a lot more effort into becoming efficient/accurate at the SAME ranges with a recurve/longbow as opposed to a compound. True or not ?
rybohunter - Glad you mentioned that ! Do you know how much MORE difficult it is to draw on a deer with a recurve/longbow than a compound ? Same difference we're talking about guy, same difference.
But is a top compound shooter goals the same as a top Trads goals???????
Yes, same goals, shoot a perfect round - right ? Compounders always get a lot closer, don't they ? And if both bows are the same challenge, why different divisions ?
Why is your free style a seperate category if it isn't more of a challenge ?
BOWFANATIC
Concerning hunting when hunting within both capabilities there is no more challenge with trad gear. I'm still waiting for stealthy or anyone to debate that issue logically.
Logically ? A bug buck is coming through the woods - you know, old mossyhorns. He steps behind a tree at 32 steps and you draw your compound. He steps out ...l but not far enough to see the lungs ... and you hold for 30 seconds until he steps once more and t then you shoot and kill him. Do that with a recurve big boy. Oh, or you could have shot him at 45 yards when he was making that scrape. The draw ability to draw and hold is enormous as is the extended distances that one is capable of shooting with a compound.
I'll anxiously awaut your logical response
do you think becoming Pro level (real pro - not wanna be pro) is harder for either or the same??
Harder for compounders because the equipment is so dang good that everyone shoots high scores of course
