It is always a "poor analogy" when it doesn't support one's own viewpoint.
how much more must be destroyed to make it a "perfect" world for the greedy hunters and farmers??
"How much more must be attempted to be "put back as it once was" to make it a "perfect" world to relieve the conscious of greenies/envios/romantics?
....at least they were able to live in harmony with their surroundings without bringing wildlife to to brink of extinction, unlike the modern american.
Kinda helps make my point, thanks. At least my way we all pay equally for the "fix", instead of fingering the guy living out at the rural margin of our society.
....may be I'll start with a few bald eagles
That, of course, is a call that is up to you to make. Are you willing to personally "pay the potential price" for that course of action?
Where does it all end? Better check the deed and the mortgage on the old homestead.
EKM