As for DD's presentation of numbers. I've already shown you he takes data and makes invalid interpretations of it. He also directly lies when refuting where data was collected from (If you don't know where don't say you do to bolster your arguement or shoot down someone elses).
That simply is not true. You gave your opinion that the antler survey was not the basis for determining the percentage of 2.5+ buck in the herd. I ,on the otherhand provided the link for the antler buck study where it states how and where the data was collected and it made no mention of voluntary check points or visits to taxidermy shops.
If the antler buck survey wasn't used to determine the percentage of 2.5+ buck, produce the study they did use. You can't do it because their is no other study.
We may not know what the exact OWDD goals should be ,but we do know when the OWDD goals of 6 DPSM for 5C. or 9 DPSM for 1A are ridiculously low . We know that the habitat in the southern tier counties can support more deer than the northern tier counties ,but te northern tier counties have much higher oWDD goals. In other words ,we know the OWDD goals simply make no sense and are not based on science.