Accurracy ain't quite the word I would use for DD "Facts" The way he extrapolates data, heck we won't have no trapolations left!!!
My research has shown that DD's facts that have some truth in them occurr at a 1 to 10 ratio compared to those that have no truth. What I propose is a plan by which we can reduce DD's facts without truth in them down so that they are oh, I don't know at about a 1.1 to 1 ratio with the facts that have some validity to them. Most of DD's facts are debunked by the time they are a year and a half old. What I propose is to only shoot down DD's facts with no validity. Do this unlimited times, then any facts with some kernal of truth in them we will leave alone allowing to stay out thier maybe an extra year or two. This will probably not work and DD's "facts" with no validity will continue to grow and outnumber those with some small kernal of truth in them. More and more will be produced ruining the habitat of the internet. Then it will take years to rebuild a healthy internet habitat. We could put Jim Slinsky in charge of the program!!
Junioprc.