Not true because it does not take in other (though smaller percentage age classes) and second becuase it's not a representative sample of the bucks harvested.
You clearly stated that the survey results were not a representative sample of the bucks harvested and that would make the results of the survey invalid. You claim they used check stations ,but they didn't. You claimed they used taxidermists but you can't support that claim with a link. Stop trying to mislead Remington and let the reports speak for themselves.
Why haven't you provided any links to help him with his research ? Why not give him a link to the Clare Co. AR program in Mich. where they are repealing AR after 5 years or the Catloosa Program in Tenn.?