Even tho what Norb would detail would be solid technical/engineering data in this case, it would still be slammed by someone just looking to stir up the chaff or those loyal to something else.
True. But then again this tends to fall in line with what I was commenting on above. It is not necessarily about solid technical/engineering data but rather about the process used to obtain that data. It would be nice if someone without any biases or allegiances looked at both sides of the issue and presented both pros and cons to both testing methods.
If Norb were to do it the correct way, it would satisfy me.
...that one had me laughing Todd....
Thinking about it, I wonder if there is a single topic where every expert agrees? First, we'd have to define expert and I'm sure we couldn't even agree on the definintion of that.
An expert is someone who expresses their opinion in a clear, concise and constructive manner....oh, and I guess they would need to have some knowledge and experience too.....