HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Feedback on the .260 Rem.
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2004 | 04:58 AM
  #7  
akbound
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Feedback on the .260 Rem.

The reason I had picked the 700 ADL with its 22" barrel is because I wanted a rifle that would do "decent" double duty. Both on varmints.....and on medium game. If I had wanted it specifically for whitetails....where I hunt them....I might have picked up a shorter barrel. And for varmints only....maybe a lighter caliber with a heavy barrel. But for a rifle that could handle both jobs...and do it fairly well.....I thought the 22" barrel length, standard weight, should work well. And it does!

I am extremely happy with my .260. It is light of recoil.....exceedingly accurate for a sporter weight rifle.....and doubles really well on varmint while really "whacking" the deer. All in all....a nice combination.

When we get back to Alaska my wife and I intend to keep it as our "light caliber" mountain rifle. (Of course backed up by a heavy caliber.....to make you "feel better" in big bear country.) But I believe the .260 will work equally well for Caribou, sheep, goat, or blacktail deer. (I will probably work up a load using a premium 140 grain.) Who knows.....might even give it a try on moose if the right circumstances present themselves. I know the caliber has a good history on Moose in the Scandanavian countries....generally using 156 grain bullets. So, I'm confident if we do our part......the cartridge will do its!

Once again....good luck for your search!
akbound is offline  
Reply