ORIGINAL: rcw280
excuse me but you had the wrong info a few posts ago it is not by Lodi but by Prairie du Sac I can see the farm from my stand up the valley about one mile away ... As my post said about Columbia county last year over 1000 deer tested with no poitives then this year one comes up positive.
You pointed out that the positive sample was near Prairie du Sac only after I showed you where the sample was on the CWD map. (For those of you that are not familiar with Wisconsin, the map below shows where Prairie du Sac and Lodi are located. The yellow sections have each registed one positive CWD sample and the one farthest to the right is the new Columbia County sample.)
Since you have a farm in Prairie du Sac, I am sure you knew that Lodi was right on the other side of the sample from you, right?
To refresh your memory, this is what you said this previously:
ORIGINAL: rcw280
Already this year columbia county which had over 1000 deer tested last year with no positives had at least one this year ... So the being99% positive it is not in other areas is failing.
So you live in Prairie du Sac huh? A sample was found right next to you at Sauk City, yet you were shocked about the new positive sample only sections away from there. That does not make any sense. Did you somehow not know they found a sample near Sauk City?
You are basically arguing that the CWD distribution was not mapped correctly, because that section between Prairie du Sac and Lodi did not register a positive last year. That does not make any sense either.
