Lets look at it this way. The landowner who found the deer - if he wasn't a nice guy, in all reality he could have kept this rack - legally, right ? He found it, there was nothing, and I mean NOTHING, to prove it was Zafts deer, other than Zaft's word, right ? So looking at it that way, the landowner actually gave the deer's rack to Zaft - a very generous thing to do, but had he wanted, he could have kept that rack and Zaft could have done NOTHING, am I right ?

So, if Zaft couldn't prove it was his deer in that scenario, how can he prove its his deer to P&Y ??

stickerpt -" The deer would not have died if Zaft had not put an arrow into it"

Now, THATS what the anti-bowhunting anti-hunting groups love to hear. I doubt you meant it like "Awe, shoot at it, stick it and maybe you'll get lucky and kill it" but thats what it came across the computer as.

Antler Eater - I guess coyotes can then - thanks for clearing that up.