The last part of rule #11 states "Only post your message into the topic it most relates too." That could not possibly be made any more clear

I'm aware that you did not realize that it was a rule, which is why I merely edited your posts instead of blocking you as a spammer. I could tell that you were looking for help, and not spamming the forum. Which is why you're still here.

Now, as to the rest of your post. You're asking a very, very specific question. There are probably very few people out there that have owned both the pronghorn and the alsea and have spent the necessary time in both boots and are able to give you a direct comparison of the two. And of the people out there who have worn both long enough to gauge the longevity between the two it's unlikely that you'll be lucky enough to find one on this forum. You may, but most likely not.

The best thing that you can do is Google reviews of each boot. That way you're getting SPECIFIC reviews for the SPECIFIC items that you are interested in. A quick Google search revealed more than just customer reviews on Bass pro and Cabela's. There are in depth reviews from places like hunttested, gear junkie, grandview outdoors, Scheels, and some others that would be worth your time to look at if you haven't already.

Like it or not, user reviews online are probably where you will get your best info. These are, after all, sportsman who purchased the product then took time to make a review on it. Some of the pages have 100+ reviews for each boot. That's allot of opinions, and a lot of info.


Good luck in your search.

-Jake