I think the state shouldn't be poisoning them if landowners aren't willing to allow hunters to eradicate them by hunting. If landowners willingly choose to charge hunters higher prices for hog hunting, then hogs are their "business" and they shouldn't whine about hog damage as that would be a cost of doing that business. JMHO and individual landowners may think different but several members above seem to indicate no landowners are willing to let hunters eradicate hogs on their property for free or minimal cost.