HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - pass-through vs. internally expended energy?
Old 01-10-2017 | 02:37 PM
  #31  
jeepkid's Avatar
jeepkid
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
From: ****ifornia
Default

Originally Posted by ipscshooter
Sounds to me like a theory made up to promote the sale of firearms chambered for cartridges too weak to achieve pass through or someone trying to justify why he doesn't like shooting a 7mm Rem Mag.

I still think that if you are using an appropriately designed hunting bullet, a round that hits the front shoulder at 2000 ft lbs and the far shoulder at 1000 ft lbs is hitting that animal harder and more effectively than a round that hits the front shoulder at 2000 ft lbs and doesn't even make it all the way to the far shoulder.

Google ballistics gel tests between a Berger and a Barnes and you'll see what they mean by "expelling all energy" inside of an animal instead of the tree behind it.

Both work, both kill animals every year...more then one way to skin a cat.
jeepkid is offline  
Reply