HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Are they a better gun???
View Single Post
Old 01-12-2016 | 07:49 AM
  #95  
Grouse45
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,926
Likes: 0
From: Saxonburg Pa
Default

Originally Posted by a1smokepole
I would like you to keep the CVA in the test and report just what you see on every gun you test and look at them all in the same way and pick them over the same. by the way this is your test and if someone what's to do there test they can buy all the guns and test them there self. just be fair and happy smoking.
When the Moderators get control of the board I will consider it. Look at all MountainDevils posts since last night. All he wants to do is talk about Knights and they have nothing to do with the topic. He doesn't know anything about CVA, he just supports it cause they used to give him free stuff. Then hes running around making challenges that he knows nothing about as well. He doesn't even know how a Wolf is right out of the box. Muleys complaining about Triumphs before I even get there.

Your on the other board as well. There are several posters over there complaining about Knights. In any of those posts do you see me supporting Knight? Do you see me bashing those people for stating there problems with Knight? Not at all, I try to help them but in the end its Knights problem on the newer guns.

Ill start the tests this weekend with the other ML'S. But CVA wont be included on this board sorry. Another thing ive realized so far is, Knight is way behind in break open technology. They need to get educated and start designing a good break open for there customers. I say this, and I by far prefer a bolt action ML.
Grouse45 is offline  
Reply