HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Surprised at lack of .308 prominence ...
View Single Post
Old 11-20-2015 | 07:39 AM
  #64  
rafsob's Avatar
rafsob
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
From: Hayes, Va.
Talking

Originally Posted by super_hunt54
It's not just a "smaller bullet" that makes it a better round raf. Significantly less recoil offers 2 things. Better option for younger hunters or those that are highly recoil sensitive, and less muzzle rise for faster target re-acquisition. It's flatter shooting and you can get better performance out of a shorter barreled rifle. Fantastic selection of bullets from the 7mm lineup makes for a VERY good cartridge for everything up to and including Elk. I just had a .338fed built to replace my longer range shot rifle in 7mm08 for the simple reason I wanted a bit more authority on impact at 400 yards on Hogs. The 7mm08 performed well but I wanted something with some more "thump" to put those long range hogs on the ground quicker on "vitals" shots. 338fed is yet another cartridge based on a .308 parent case. The case is wonderful but the .308 is mediocre when there can be SOOOOO much more done with that case.
Hey pal, don't get me wrong -- I don't want to sound like I'm putting this round down. No way. I've been a firearms instructor for almost 20 years and I understand the recoil factor. And also the ballistics advantage of this round. My comment was targeted at the deer hunting situation.

I was deer hunting the other day and capped a large female coyote, 45 lbs, with a 338 Federal. I love this round and wanted to finally take my Kimber 84M out in the woods. And actually the round was a little over kill on a yote, but would not let this killer go without ending her life.

As to your comments I completely agree!!! Good hunting.
rafsob is offline  
Reply