HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Powder Charges & Round Balls
View Single Post
Old 10-31-2015 | 06:15 PM
  #78  
OldBob47
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Default PT Gold

Originally Posted by super_hunt54
I've actually used the 240, 260, and 300 scorpions. When I was using them it was in Pa and the deer ,body wise, just aren't all that big for the most part in Pa. Didn't really feel I needed really big bullet weights and most all of my shots where I ML hunted were well within 75 yards so I didn't need heavy loads either. I used those 240's over 70 grains T7 loose out of that old hawken. Recoil was very moderate and that old hawken of mine hates heavy powder loads anyway. Never could find a bullet that was accurate out of her with anything over 80 grains. My TC PH on the other hand shoots shotgun groups with anything under 95 grains.

Ron also gave you a superior bullet choice in the Lehigh CF bullets. I've done some testing with those bullets and they are deadly accurate out of both mine as well. But they are a little salty in price. The .452 245 grain CF is being reported as an outstanding bullet for MLers. I'm letting my daughter use my hawken this year since I am out of action for this years hunting. She is very recoil sensitive so I settled on the 250 Bloodlines over 70 grains Swiss FFG which is about at her limit for recoil. The bloodlines are the predecessor to the CF's and everyone that I have heard of using them always give them the thumbs up. Bloodline also has 220 grain bullets that may be just the ticket. Not sure where your granddaughter will be hunting nor the average size of the whitetail around there. Here in IL we have Does that will rival Buck size in a lot of other states. We gots some big ole girlies around here so I chose the 250's for the added "thump".
Super_Hunt54,

If I were choosing a bullet today, I would probably go with the PT Golds, in whatever weight (240 or 260) that shot best out of the gun she was using. However, we are about a year from the Presidential election, and if Hillary gets in, lead bullets of any configuration might be history. I think she knows that outright arms prohibition would not fly, because it would require a legislative initiative. However, prohibiting lead bullets would be a regulatory change, bypassing Congress. This is not science, because if you study the effects of ingestion of any of the proposed bullet materials, all of them are bad, just in different ways. I think we could see some unfortunate changes in the not-too-distant future, though.
OldBob
OldBob47 is offline  
Reply