Im a broadhead collector with more than 500 dif heads in my arsenal. I do a lot of broadhead testing. Im party to assisting many bowhunters in their gear selection and setup. I run a broadhead only novelty shoot at the nations oldest and largest broadhead shoot. I have those heads. I watched as one of my shooters used the toxic you mention on a foam target (when he could hit it from 20 yards). Of all the heads, the toxic represented the least amount of penetration.

As to accuracy, that is on you and your ability to broadhead tune your bow. Given enough time and effort and properly spined arrow there is no reason they can’t be tuned to fly with consistency (that’s the best you can hope for since accuracy rests on your shoulders)

I find them near impossible to hone or re-sharpen so they are a one-and-done (disposable) broadhead. If you are one of the younger disposable bowhunters that may not be important to you and just by new blades. You will need a set to practice with and another set of blades to hunt with so you need to buy a couple packs.

There are over 3000 diff and unique broadheads recognized by the American Broadhead Collectors Club. Ive tried and I cant come up with an answer to what problem this head solved or what solution they offer with their blade design and configuration that other heads don’t/can’t do.

If “cool looking” is of value to you or a driving reason to have them in your quiver, then buy some, tune for them and hunt with them but by all means, accuracy is the primary goal. If they consistently hit where you aim, you are half way there. If you always get a pass through and outstanding blood trails with them, you will have a pretty strong argument for using them.

The “Plug cutter” broadhead is nothing new and all suffer from hair, stringy tissue, fat, etc slowing and stopping penetration. Again, what problem does this design solve that needed solving (aside from looking neat?)