Yes but it DOES say "or COMMISSION REGULATION" therefor negating it in muzzleloading context. That would be the confusion. In the wording of the law it is giving overriding authority (in this instance) to the regulatory commission. While ignorance of the law is no excuse, poor wording of the law in conjunction with the regulatory commission would be bordering entrapment really. A hunter shouldn't have to have a law degree to figure out what should be simplistic and well worded, easy to understand rules.

These are the bad boys that are currently being used in my .458 SOCOM and are performing better than most any other bullet I have used so far on hogs. They are leaving devastating internal damage in fairly large hogs. Had one of my hunting partners use my SOCOM with these loaded up. He has taken a few lung shots just for testing and reported "gooy mess" internally with very little meat damage.


Whether or not I use the .50 cal or a new .45 cal will dictate which XP I want to hunt with next year. This thing is one mean bullet. The flutes cut into the nose of the bullet create a hydraulic force inside the fluid environment of the animal that decimates lung and heart tissue. Unlike FMJ's that are designed to just punch through, these things leave a trail of destruction internally.