You've got all wrong, Pete. You're making unsubstantiated claims for situations you know nothing about and using that as your validation. That is, you weren't there with the shooters, you don't know what evidence was brought forward in court and those specialists that proved the barrels were suspect. Don't try to feed me that I wasn't there either nonsense. No, I wasn't, but I was able to provide information to substantiate the claims against BPI. Don't say it only involved magnum charges when that isn't correct, either. Take whatever stance you want. You opinion factually amounts to NUTHIN!