Originally Posted by
Game Stalker
Pete, everyone but yourself can see you have provided nothing to back up your opinion. Notice that many of these were settled. If BPI weren't at fault, do you think they wouldn't have fought it? The question also remains: What non disclosure agreements did BPI benefit from in the process? Many of these are old, but some are newer.
http://www.theohiooutdoors.com/showt...?6535-cva-wolf . See post #5-7. Pete, now it's your turn. Show some evidence or keep quiet.
What's to stop any injured shooter from exclaiming he didn't load two powders and two bullets?..... he didn't short-start the load?......... he didn't load 250 grains of powder first?.
The only times injured shooters have no (truthful or lying) beef.... are when smokeless powder loads are used. It's easy for investigators to uncover smokeless in the bore. Other than that, the injured parties can lie thru their teeth and get compensated.
CVAs (as per Grouse) have the weakest barrels. You should ask Grouse for proof of that. CVA also sells the most MLs by-far. So they have a reason for being #1 in the Complaint Department.