Hmmmm,,, No links or anything showing what the cat. failure actually was? In the CVA report there were all kinds of actual proof and documentation. I have several TC barrels and not a single one of them, including the muzzleloader, has ever shown the slightest hint of poor craftsmanship or quality. Now granted all of them are pre S&W takeover but it seems so is this complaint.

After a little research I found out some things about that little thing you just put up there Pete. He joined up on SEVERAL sites posting this thing you put up. He neglected to put up the link which actually had DETAILS. Those details were that the Stock broke and the scope hit him in the eye!!! Here is a picture of the offending rifle.




Could anyone please show me a cat. failure that has a dang thing to do with "headspace" as Brian tried to say that was the reason? ANyone that is a real shooter knows that with TC's you may have to shim a little here and there to get proper headspace. It's the nature of the beast. There is absolutely NO way you can have interchangeable barrels with different cartridges and calibers and have dead on headspacing! They get it as close as possible from a manufacturing standpoint and SAFETY.

Pete, you also failed to put in that Brian was found to be 40% liable as well!