Originally Posted by
Big Uncle
All of the ancillary issues just muddy the intended point.
As I first said this was lease. To be clear this was a lease of privately owned property. No BLM, state lands, National Forest. The outfitter is not one of the rouge outfitters that bend the rules to their favor, block roads, chase people from public property, etc. This was intentional trespass by a former client that knew the ranch and it's borders.
A sad act of a pathetic individual - and now apparently an internet expert!
I would agree 100% if we had known what you have now stated at the beginning of this thread. Everything since that first post has been scenarios of what can happen on both ends and many times it's the outfitter or landowner who is in violation of the law. If what you've mentioned is accurate, it's a shame and too bad the guy hasn't been nailed to the cross for being a scofflaw!