Originally Posted by
Topgun 3006
Funny that this thread is now nine pages and that all of us have the same view on this except you.
It wouldn't be the first time I've stood alone.. probably won't be the last.
That's because your ideas make no sense and are far from the majority, logical view on trespassing.
Well you were doing ok until you made this statement. My ideas make no sense?? What makes no sense?
Far from the majority ? Ya.. ok.. I can agree to that... But then you go one step further and add "logical" to your description... How is being lenient concerning trespassers not logical???
You're the one who is coming up with all these BS posts saying each of us has something wrong with us, insulting/dissing a service man, etc.!!!
Wow.. are you just making stuff up as you go along? I can do that too if you like but I'll refrain if you do from future comments.
Please stick to the facts.. don't embellish, don't twist them, and don't try to relabel the meaning of comments.
Oh, and by the way, if you think that me calling you names when I say you're a clairvoyant is a personal insult, then you are the one who should stay out of ALL discussions on this site because things are way over your head, and if you don't call what you just posted back to me an insult on your part, then booby you defiinitely need to rethink things.
You know, it would be great if you could just get back to the subject of the conversation.. Hold the personal attacks, but please feel free to blast away with your opinions and why you have them.
So lets see if I can put this back on track.. (and please correct me if I am mistaken here)..
You think that trespassing for any reason is wrong and should be treated as a serious crime. Does that sum it up?
I think that trespassing is not wrong so long as the person doing it is not being malicious. (IE: is not hunting, stealing, destroying, spying, or any other type of nefarious activity).
My opinion is that if a trespasser is following a blood trail it is not an issue for me.
I think the real root of this argument is that it is nearly impossible to determine if someone is trespassing benignly or just taking advantage of your absence.