So says you, self-appointed keeper of all wisdom. Okay, so here it is - I agree with very little of what you've posted in the past. But I'm not going to let it go at that, because what's left is the opportunity for someone who is curious about the topic to be led down the path of your BS.

Let's be very clear here - you aren't posting questions here, you're making statements. Don't attempt to suggest that you're being beaten up because someone thought your question was stupid, or try to garner support from others by implying that you're being picked on.

If someone truly does have a question - and there are a number of contemporary examples of that still active on this board, then be open to all the suggestions you're going to get. If you come here looking for affirmation that something you've done was wise when it wasn't, don't be surprised what you get.

From what I've seen of you so far, your posts have provided little knowledge of value:

- A high-quality, light-profile barrel will shoot as well as a standard-quality heavy barrel. True, but compare high-quality to high-quality, and the equation changes completely and your statement is no longer so true.

- Commercial .270 ammunition can now be had which performs to the level it previously took a magnum to reach. True. However, the same knowledge or technology which makes that possible also makes it possible for the magnum cartridges to perform better than they ever did as well.

You like to tailor (yes, "cherry-pick") your facts to suit your argument, and you're pretty dang free with contriving an argument. You're pretty dang arrogant as well inferring that a thread you start somehow belongs to you.

You want to be a Moderator here? It's so unfriendly and you've done so much to improve that (sarcasm intended). I know of a couple other forums as well that had you made the statements here that you did there you'd be listening to the crickets chirp - they wouldn't even bother responding other than maybe an "lol."