threads like these are the reason I post very little here, I know just a bit about rifles and ballistics, I have read enough inaccurate info on here that I could pick it apart piece by piece but then I would have my posts deleted, prolly be banned, and this incorrect info would still be here. If your gonna post your opinion as an undeniable fact, then have the proof to back it up (which you don't I assure you) so why get your underoos in a wad when you get called out? I know these guys from years of reading they're posts, they're not disagreeing with you just because they can, you need to consider that no matter where you are in your shooting carreer, there are more than likely folks who have already been there.
what you think means little to me, you already think you know it all, what concerns me are folks who read this BS and take it as truth, the only way the superformance ammo bridges a gap between standard and magnum rounds is because they use a blended powder that they think they can control well enough to toe the line on maximum saami specs and its not a sure thing, some of the superformance has already been discontinued, some of it is not even available in the us due to being over saami max pressures, every handloader out there today can match it if they wish cause when it comes down to it no matter what powder ya use pressure makes velocity, if you tailor a load that peaks pressure after the bullet is into the rifleing you will suffer shorter brass life but you can get numbers that will exceed even the superformace standards, but your over pressure, but the superformance ammo only has to last 1 round. I can, have and do outrun a 264 win mag with a 270 based parent case (by a lot) brass life is short but its not hard to do, the load is safe in my rifle, but not sure about every rifle on the market.
RR