Andy has a lot of detailed description of a situation he was not witness to, making assumptions/accusations that are factually incorrect. The hunt was in fact a last minute deal. First place had birds sometimes on it, but not on the property or close to it that day (on another ridge far from it). Neither here or there. At times I am sure they are. There is no dispute about quality of properties, and no clue why he is going there with that. I had hunted with his service twice before, not three times as claimed. No problems with those hunts. This hunt was a nightmare. I cannot go into details because of pending litigation. I can tell you that his account of it here, is not factual which is curious as he did not show up or was able to (had no vehicle as he put it). I can also tell you that it it was bad enough that I left even though I had 3 more days open in my schedule. I am forced to use the BBB and legal means to try and recoup my $$. The dialog has been very unpleasant/personal, and not something to be repeated here.