RE: Got a response from mathews
I wonder what so called " innovations" they have planned for this year. The roller guard is pretty much worthless and doens' t change performance of the bow, in fact all I' ve read on it is that it caused lots of headaches with cable wear. String suppressors?...You know you are getting desperate when that is the biggest imporovment for a model year. I just don' t like the idea of a hole in my limb at that point. Parrallel limb design, please, I don' t see hoyt going parralel, and they seem quite comfortable being ahead of mathews setting all these new records with the cam.5. Sure they are backed into a corner and I don' t think they do have a good view, because I believe that the view looks better from ahead than it does behind...does anyone concure on this? The v-lock limb cup system, what a joke. I just saw a really really old jennings bow with a forged riser at a yardsale that had the same exact thing. The only thing mathews can do to keep up with the new trend of 2 cams, duallys, and cams that are greater than one but less than two is to market there own. Maybe come out with stronger limbs and how bout some better customer service. Slap some winners choice strings and cables on as stock and stop using your inferior zebra twist strings...they creep, they suck, bite the bullet and get over it. I would suggest dumping the roller guard, its useless. Also, better grips and how bout some mossy oak camo instead of bill jergins camo. I' m a fan of solid limbs so keep them, how bout a pivoting limb pocket, and an adjustable cam. I' m sorry for rambling on but man do I hate mathews. I hate there advertising and I pretty much made my conclusion on the company and the people who run it based on that. They remind me of the older brother who doesnt like being shown up by the younger so he' ll do dirty tricks to make them look superior and the younger inferior, only instead making a complete horses ass out themeselves and making the younger shine in the process.