The tough "BLEEP" metality is pretty funny, especially in a case such as the NJ situation where virtually everyone, hunters across the country, rallied behind the legal hunter except for the state COs and judge who realized they screwed up but wouldn't admit to it. So he's innocent and eveyone knows it but found guilty by one single judge (no jury in that trial - always request a jury trial or its like the Old West). But tough "BLEEP" to him and tough "BLEEP" to the 18 year old who made a non-violent mistake and spends the next couple of decades bettering himself and contributing to society.

Believe me, I'm the last one to be a touchy, feely tree-hugger. I lean more to the right and believe you should do the time for the crime. But once the time is done, it's done. You don't lock them up and throw away the key - EXCEPT for violent offenders who hurt and kill others, especially children. We need to focus on tougher punishments for these individuals instead.

Finally, so what if all of these people saying tough "BLEEP" were innocent but found guilty of some crime or wildlife violation. There was a case here in Minnesota this year where the guy was exonnerated a year later and finally got his hunting equipment back! How would you feel then? Would you like the rest of us to say tough "BLEEP?" You're guilty, the COs say you are, even if there isn't clear evidence. If you do the crime, you do the time. Even though you didn't? Didn't think so. As a Republican, and that shouldn't matter, I believe in the Constituion and want it to protect my rights, period.