HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Mountaineer or Triumph?
View Single Post
Old 02-27-2012 | 06:37 AM
  #14  
sabotloader's Avatar
sabotloader
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,703
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default

[quote=Geaux Tigers;3915788]
Originally Posted by sabotloader
One bullet that I use that has really been accurate for me is the Lehigh/Bloodline .458-275 gr. DOA. To me it is a great all-around bullet and has great 'terminal ballstics'

This is a post I put up sometime back shooting my Mountaineer in the Rock Pit..QUOTE]

Nice post and great shooting. Looking at the ballistics info on Knight's website for this bullet, the energy at 200 yds using 120 grains of Triple 7 pellets, is about 740 ft/lbs. Is there a difference with the powder you used?

According to the same chart, using 120 grains of Blackhorn it is a little over 1,000 ft/lbs. Have you tried BH with this bullet?
The only difference is that I was using T7 loose powder. I have never found pellets to be as consistent as loose powder. If you were to weigh the individual pellets in a box I think you would understand.

I have used BH but because of the price per shot, I do not see enough advantage to make the switch. And do not get me wrong BH is a great powder.

This is a copy of a velocity comparison test I did between the two powders. I am shooting close to 3000 feet in elvation also so that will effect velocity somewhat. Ignore the line that says the sabot was a Blue 4050 sabot that is an error from the previous test using a 45 cal rifle. I will throw in the same typ of chart that I did for a 45 cal gun also. It is actually more complete than is the 50 Chart






This ballistic sheet was computed from velocities atained with 120 grains of T7-2f


Last edited by sabotloader; 02-27-2012 at 06:45 AM.
sabotloader is offline  
Reply