Clint.....you stated that " crossbows are not archery in the truest sense" . So, what is archery in the truest sense? Dual cams? Single cams? 50%, 65%,, 80% let-off? Fiber optic sights? Pendulem sights? Hand held releases? Graphite arrows? Mechanical broadheads? String dampeners? You also stated that they are more accurate and powerful than a handheld bow. Accuracy has nothing to do with the equipment, it has to do with the shooter.

A bow that is held and shot at arms length is archery. A crossbow ih held and aimed with a stock, like a rifle. Typically, crossbows have scopes or similar devices to aim them. The equipment obviously does make a difference! Such a setup makes for a much steadier hold. Believe me, I have shot crossbows. A shooter with little practice and effort can quickly master shooting a crossbow. Crossbows typically have a draw weight of around 150 lbs as opposed to a compound' s 60-70 lb draw. Crossbows obviously shoot a faster projectile than a compound. I have nothing against crossbows or those who use them. I just think it is easier to harvest an animal with a crossbow than with any bow that is held at arms length. True archers should have the first hunting opportunity since this is the most difficult and challenging way to take a deer. As I stated, I believe that crossbows are a hybrid between a bow and a gun. I maintain that archers who hold their bows at arms length should have their own season. It is too bad that the disabled gentleman was treated so badly. They were obviously slobs, cowards, and criminals. Let me ask...would you want to compete in your archery competitions with your handheld bow while others are competing against you with a crossbow? I think most competitors would cry foul.

Clint