This is an often discussed issue ... when does the use of technology used in hunting wild game cross the line of "fairness" ? I have no clue. I'd like be able to to say that I am "old school", but truth is I am just "old". During the past 50 years of hunting I have "progressed" from a 3-shot, bolt action .410 to a 12 g., screw in choke, high tech auto loader. My archery gear which was once upon a time a Ben Pearson "Stick" and cedar arrows ... is now one of the latest and better designed cross bows equipped with a 3-dot LED scope. My rifle hunting gear has "risen" from a lever action, iron sighted rifle that is no longer in production to a drop dead accurate bolt action rifle on top of which sits about the best scope money can buy. My "old" hunting clotes were whatever was more or less too worn out to wear to school. Mostly blue denim, a cotton shirt, canvas jacket ... and if I was lucky maybe a wool coat. My duck hunting boots were "US Kids" that I had slicked off the treds playing basketball. Thanks to superbly constructed boots, high tech fabrics, and super light weight insulation I can hunt comfortably in a driving rain or 95F heat or 35 MPH winds or temperatures approaching 0F ... or about any combination thereof. One can argue the advantages of cammo, but some of this stuff is so realistic that it boggles the mind. I ride an ATV to within a half-mile or less of almost everywhere I hunt. IO have binos that can give my old eyes a chance of picking out game in very low light at well past 1500 yards. I use a climbing stand that can safely take me up well past 25'. I have portable pop-up blinds. And so on ... and so on. So how far back .... 3-4 of us running around barefooted, clothed in only crudely put together animal skins, toting a sharpened stick, trying to drive a few critters off a cliff ?? Like I said, I don't know where the line is to be drawn. I guess it is a personal choice.