2 things come to mind:

1. Wouldn't the hunting (if it were allowed) be done on private property? Why should a person who doesn't own the land being hunted have a say?

2. If the citizens of Solon want to make disparaging remarks re: the state natural resources org.'s management of the deer herd, let them pony up some money. It would sure make hunting licenses cheaper for OH residents. The hunters of OH are vested in the game. The non-hunting citizens of Solon have nothing invested.

Who pays for the alternative options? You think the anti's will?