HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Ballistically superior or sufficient
View Single Post
Old 09-20-2011 | 04:45 AM
  #12  
flounder33
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

If someone is going to make an arguement that we should only use a "superior" projectile for hunting with a muzzleloader I think we are treading on a slippery slope. It would logically follow that we should only use a "superior" firearm. No one could argue that most centerfire rifles are "superior" to even the best muzzleloader.
I do not get hung up on thinking I need to use a roundball or a conical just because it is more traditional. At the same time, if I am confident that that roundball or conical will do the job it is intended to do and I know I can put them where I am aiming, I have no qualms about hunting with either.
flounder33 is offline  
Reply